Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. Grams., and Steele, C. M. (2009). J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 97 (6), 1045–1060. doi:/a0016239

Sex Spots 82 (3-4), 127–141

Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A great., Montoya, A beneficial. K., and Jiang, L. (2017). Exactly why are Certain Stalk areas Much more Gender Well-balanced Than others? Psychol. Bull. 143 (1), 1–thirty five. doi:/bul0000052

Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., and you may Hudson, L. (2013). This new Stereotypical Desktop Scientist: Gendered mass media Representations once the a buffer so you can Introduction for females. doi:/s11199-013-0296-x

Sex Positions 69 (1-2), 58–71

Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, E., and you may Lo, L. (2013). Perform gender-science Stereotypes Anticipate Science Identification and you may Science Occupation Fantasies One of Student Science Majors? Soc. Psychol. Educ. 16 (4), 541–554. doi:/s11218-013-9232-8

Destatis (2019). Studierende within the Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaft (MINT) und Technik-Fachern. Wiesbaden, Germany: Students for the mathematics, computer research, technology and you can techology (STEM) industries . Recovered off

Diekman, An effective. B., Steinberg, M., Brown, Age. Roentgen., Belanger, A great. L., and you may Clark, E. K. (2017). An objective Congruity Brand of Character Entryway, Wedding, and you can Get off: Insights Public Goal Procedure in the Stalk Gender Gaps. Pers Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21 (2), 142–175. doi:868316642141

Eagly, A great. H., and you can Karau, S. J. (2002). Character Congruity Theory out of Prejudice toward Women Frontrunners. Psychol. Rev. 109 (3), 573–598. doi:-295x.109.step 3.573

Eagly, A. H., and Wood, W. (2012). “Personal Character Idea,” during the Manual from Theories regarding Personal Mindset, Regularity II. Editors P. van Lange, Good. Kruglanski, and Age. Higgins (Los angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE ), 458–476. doi:446249222.n49

Eaton, A. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, Roentgen. K., and you can West, K. (2020). How Gender and you may Race Stereotypes Impact the Development of Students during the STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations from Physics and you will Biology Post-Doctoral Individuals. doi:/s11199-019-01052-w

Else-Trip, N. Meters., Hyde, J. S., and Linn, Meters. C. (2010). Cross-federal Habits out of Gender Variations in Math: Good Meta-Data. Psychol. Bull. 136 (1), 103–127. doi:/a0018053

Gender Equality Bureau Cabinet Work environment (2017). Gender Equality White Papers (Share Release. Tokyo, Japan: Light papers for the gender equivalence 2017 . Recovered from

Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. Good., and Brooks, A great. W. (2015)pared in order to Guys, Feminine Glance at Elite Advancement due to the fact Similarly Achievable, however, Less Popular. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S An effective. 112 (40), 12354–12359. doi:/pnas.1502567112

Gray, J. A good., and you will McN). This new Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An enquiry toward Attributes of one’s buddy Program. Oxford: Oxford College or university Push .

Greenwald, A beneficial. G., McGhee, D. Age., and you can Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring Private Differences in Implicit Knowledge: The fresh Implicit Association Attempt. J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464–1480. doi://0022-.6.1464

Gudykunst, W. B., and you will Lee, C. Yards. (2003). Evaluating the fresh new Validity of Self Construal Scales. Humm Res 30 (2), 253–274. doi:/j.1468-.tb00838.x

Heilman, Yards. Age., and you may Caleo, S. (2018)batting Gender Discrimination: A lack of Fit Structure. Category Procedure. Intergroup Relations 21 (5), 725–744. doi:430218761587

Ikkatai, Y., Inoue, Good., Kano, K., Minamizaki, A., McKay, E., and you will Yokoyama, H. Yards. (2019). Adult Egalitarian Perceptions on Gender Opportunities Affect Arrangement on the Girls Taking Stem sphere at the college during the The japanese. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 41 (16), 2254–2270. doi:635

Ikkatai, Y., Minamizaki, A good., Kano, K., Inoue, Good., McKay, Age., and you can Yokoyama, H. M. (2020). Gender-biased Personal Impression off Stalk industries, Emphasizing new Determine from Egalitarian Attitudes with the Gender Opportunities. Jcom 19 (01), A08. doi:3/dos.19010208

Jasko, K., Pyrkosz?Pacyna, J., Czarnek, Grams., Dukala, K., and you can Szastok, M. (2020). The new Base Scholar: Immediately after Graduation, Someone Currently Disagree in Employment Consequences, Attributions for success, and you may Wished Work Attributes. J. Soc. Affairs 76 (3), 512–542. doi:/josi.12392

Kemmelmeier, M. (2016). Social Differences in Questionnaire Responding: Things and Serbia morsiustoimistohaku Facts regarding Study of Reaction Biases. Int. J. Psychol. 51 (6), 439–444. doi:/ijop.12386