Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. Grams., and Steele, C. M. (2009). J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 97 (6), 1045\u20131060. doi:\/a0016239<\/p>\r\r\n
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A great., Montoya, A beneficial. K., and Jiang, L. (2017). Exactly why are Certain Stalk areas Much more Gender Well-balanced Than others? Psychol. Bull. 143 (1), 1\u2013thirty five. doi:\/bul0000052<\/p>\r\r\n
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Handron, C., and you may Hudson, L. (2013). This new Stereotypical Desktop Scientist: Gendered mass media Representations once the a buffer so you can Introduction for females. doi:\/s11199-013-0296-x<\/p>\r\r\n
Cundiff, J. L., Vescio, T. K., Loken, E., and you may Lo, L. (2013). Perform gender-science Stereotypes Anticipate Science Identification and you may Science Occupation Fantasies One of Student Science Majors? Soc. Psychol. Educ. 16 (4), 541\u2013554. doi:\/s11218-013-9232-8<\/p>\r\r\n
Destatis (2019). Studierende within the Mathematik, Informatik, Naturwissenschaft (MINT) und Technik-Fachern. Wiesbaden, Germany: Students for the mathematics, computer research, technology and you can techology (STEM) industries . Recovered off<\/p>\r\r\n
Diekman, An effective. B., Steinberg, M., Brown, Age. Roentgen., Belanger, A great. L., and you may Clark, E. K. (2017). An objective Congruity Brand of Character Entryway, Wedding, and you can Get off: Insights Public Goal Procedure in the Stalk Gender Gaps. Pers Soc. Psychol. Rev. 21 (2), 142\u2013175. doi:868316642141<\/p>\r\r\n
Eagly, A great. H., and you can Karau, S. J. (2002). Character Congruity Theory out of Prejudice toward Women Frontrunners. Psychol. Rev. 109 (3), 573\u2013598. doi:-295x.109.step 3.573<\/p>\r\r\n
Eagly, A. H., and Wood, W. (2012). \u201cPersonal Character Idea,\u201d during the Manual from Theories regarding Personal Mindset, Regularity II. Editors P. van Lange, Good. Kruglanski, and Age. Higgins (Los angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE ), 458\u2013476. doi:446249222.n49<\/p>\r\r\n
Eaton, A. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, Roentgen. K., and you can West, K. (2020). How Gender and you may Race Stereotypes Impact the Development of Students during the STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations from Physics and you will Biology Post-Doctoral Individuals. doi:\/s11199-019-01052-w<\/p>\r\r\n
Else-Trip, N. Meters., Hyde, J. S., and Linn, Meters. C. (2010). Cross-federal Habits out of Gender Variations in Math: Good Meta-Data. Psychol. Bull. 136 (1), 103\u2013127. doi:\/a0018053<\/p>\r\r\n
Gender Equality Bureau Cabinet Work environment (2017). Gender Equality White Papers (Share Release. Tokyo, Japan: Light papers for the gender equivalence 2017 . Recovered from<\/p>\r\r\n
Gino, F., Wilmuth, C. Good., and Brooks, A great. W. (2015)pared in order to Guys, Feminine Glance at Elite Advancement due to the fact Similarly Achievable, however, Less Popular. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S An effective. 112 (40), 12354\u201312359. doi:\/pnas.1502567112<\/p>\r\r\n
Gray, J. A good., and you will McN). This new Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An enquiry toward Attributes of one’s buddy Program. Oxford: Oxford College or university Push .<\/p>\r\r\n
Greenwald, A beneficial. G., McGhee, D. Age., and you can Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring Private Differences in Implicit Knowledge: The fresh Implicit Association Attempt. J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 74, 1464\u20131480. doi:\/\/0022-.6.1464<\/p>\r\r\n
Gudykunst, W. B., and you will Lee, C. Yards. (2003). Evaluating the fresh new Validity of Self Construal Scales. Humm Res 30 (2), 253\u2013274. doi:\/j.1468-.tb00838.x<\/p>\r\r\n
Heilman, Yards. Age., and you may Caleo, S. (2018)batting Gender Discrimination: A lack of Fit Structure. Category Procedure. Intergroup Relations 21 (5), 725\u2013744. doi:430218761587<\/p>\r\r\n
Ikkatai, Y., Inoue, Good., Kano, K., Minamizaki, A., McKay, E., and you will Yokoyama, H. Yards. (2019). Adult Egalitarian Perceptions on Gender Opportunities Affect Arrangement on the Girls Taking Stem sphere at the college during the The japanese. Int. J. Sci. Edu. 41 (16), 2254\u20132270. doi:635<\/p>\r\r\n
Ikkatai, Y., Minamizaki, A good., Kano, K., Inoue, Good., McKay, Age., and you can Yokoyama, H. M. (2020). Gender-biased Personal Impression off Stalk industries, Emphasizing new Determine from Egalitarian Attitudes with the Gender Opportunities. Jcom 19 (01), A08. doi:3\/dos.19010208<\/p>\r\r\n
Jasko, K., Pyrkosz?Pacyna, J., Czarnek, Grams., Dukala, K., and you can Szastok, M. (2020). The new Base Scholar: Immediately after Graduation, Someone Currently Disagree in Employment Consequences, Attributions for success, and you may Wished Work Attributes. J. Soc. Affairs 76 (3), 512\u2013542. doi:\/josi.12392<\/p>\r\r\n